On 2/24/07, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 24, 2007, at 10:02, Thomas Charron wrote: > The dependency couldn't be met. The package maintainer screwed up, > and had it dependent on a version of a package that wasn't available. Ah, OK, thanks for the correction. Still, if I hit that problem I'd go file a bug at bugzilla.redhat.com. Granted I've had mixed success with that avenue.
Hehe, problem was, system was unusable in the half upgraded state. So he naturally did what every geek does. Take the safety off. :-D -- -- Thomas _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
