On Friday 13 June 2008, Thomas Charron wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Charlie Farinella
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have 2 Openvpn clients.
> > MachineA (10.8.0.6)
> > MachineB (10.8.0.10)
> >
> > MachineA has 2 physical ethernet cards:
> >    192.168.x.1
> >    10.10.0.10
> >
> > I need to add a route from MachineB (10.8.0.10) to the second 
ethernet
> > interface on MachineA (10.10.0.10).  My clients can see and connect 
to
> > each other.
> >
> > I have set "route add -net 10.10.0.10 -netmask 255.255.255.0 
10.8.0.6",
> > but cannot ping the address and running traceroute doesn't show it 
using
> > 10.8.0.6 as the gateway.  I have tried various permutations of the
> > above with no luck and feel like I am missing an important part of 
this
> > puzzle.
> 
>   10.10.0.10 is the IP address, NOT the network address.  Based on
> your netmask, shouldn't you be using 10.10.0.0 as the address in the
> route?

Typo.  I am in fact using 10.10.0.0 in the route.

--charlie

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Farinella 
Appropriate Solutions, Inc. (www.AppropriateSolutions.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice: 603.924.6079   fax: 603.924.8668

_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/

Reply via email to