On Friday 13 June 2008, Neil Joseph Schelly wrote: > This doesn't sound like an OpenVPN thing at all. Does MachineB know that it's > supposed to route traffic between it's 10.8.0/24 network and it's 10.10.0/24 > network? If it knows that much, then OpenVPN doesn't have to be involved at > all and you just add the route as you specified. > -N
You're the second person to phrase it that way, "does the machine know that it's supposed to route traffic". Showing my ignorance I will ask how do I make sure it "knows" to do this. I thought running the route command did that, but apparently there's more. thanks, --charlie > On Friday 13 June 2008 13:03, Charlie Farinella wrote: > > I have 2 Openvpn clients. > > MachineA (10.8.0.6) > > MachineB (10.8.0.10) > > > > MachineA has 2 physical ethernet cards: > > 192.168.x.1 > > 10.10.0.10 > > > > I need to add a route from MachineB (10.8.0.10) to the second ethernet > > interface on MachineA (10.10.0.10). My clients can see and connect to > > each other. > > > > I have set "route add -net 10.10.0.10 -netmask 255.255.255.0 10.8.0.6", > > but cannot ping the address and running traceroute doesn't show it using > > 10.8.0.6 as the gateway. I have tried various permutations of the > > above with no luck and feel like I am missing an important part of this > > puzzle. > > > > If someone is good with Openvpn, I could use some help. > > > > thanks, > > > > --charlie > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Charles Farinella Appropriate Solutions, Inc. (www.AppropriateSolutions.com) [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice: 603.924.6079 fax: 603.924.8668 _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
