Michael ODonnell writes:
> However, I'm obliged to confirm their assertion (while repulsed
> by their attitudes and methods) because, strictly speaking, it is
> true that a "spotless discipline record" proves essentially nothing.
> Think of all the fscking @55h0le5 you know (or know of) who happen to
> have a "spotless" record, at least as far as the relevant authorities
> are concerned. So that was actually more of a "lack of data" point...
This point reminds me of a snippet of code I wrote once...hmm...where
is it now....oh, wait...there it is:
/*
* Check to see if this packet looks authentic or not.
*
* N.B: the opposite of "definitely not authentic" is *not*
* "definitely authentic".
*/
if (isPacketDefinitelyNotAuthentic(recvBuf, recvSize)) {
.....
Of course, how I write code and how I expect to be treated in society
are two things.
Regards,
--kevin
--
GnuPG ID: B280F24E God, I loved that Pontiac.
alumni.unh.edu!kdc -- Tom Waits
http://kdc-blog.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
