On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:41:00 -0400 Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excellent [re-]start Ted. Thanks for remembering this! Indeed. Of course the age old problem still exists. Since everyone wants to be as egalitarian as our roots require (and I essentially agree with this view), who-when-and how is it to be determined that this should be done and how it is done? Not being an organized group, I suspect someone will simply have to take the bit in theteeth and do it since there is no mechanism to do otherwise. That said, I believe a concrete proposal should be developed, circulated, and presented to the attendees of a quarterly meeting for an up or down vote. I say that because it is important that all those who participate in GNHLUG should have a chance to review and comment before the finalization of the necessary docs, but I also believe it is not feasible to have all concerns addressed or accepted nor for a final document to be developed at a given general meeting. Ed Lawson Ed Lawson _______________________________________________ gnhlug-org mailing list gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org
