Le 20/09/2016 à 22:56, Olivier Henley a écrit : > 2. To me a commit named V1.2a is miss-leading as being alpha regardless > the real alpha commit is named V1.2-alpha. Same thing for V1.2b. If you > want to say it is a stable release why not use the term stable. My two > cents. Two more cents: the convention I use, which was set up by our company quality manager: Version numbers are: M.msn, where: M is the major version number m is the minor version number s is 'a' for alpha, 'b' for beta, and 'r' for release n is a continuously growing sequence number, irrespectively of s
For example, I had versions like: 1.18b1, 1.18b2, ... 1.18b7, 1.18r8 (soon to be released ;-) ) I find this simple and convenient. -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Gnoga-list mailing list Gnoga-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnoga-list
