On 9/15/08, Alex Launi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 7:20 AM, J. Carlos Navea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Let me try this again. I'm not arguing that parsing out strings in _these_ > examples is hard. It isn't. My argument is that whatever regexp/logic I put > in to parse these strings will not address all the possible ways the bin > Exec string can be formatted as. > > Can you give me an example of one that doesn't fit? I don't know of any. > Here's one: xdg-open ~/.wine/drive_c
Parsing this would almost certainly give you xdg-open's manpage, which is not at all what you want. The question is whether or not false-positives like these are dealbreakers. I'd be inclined to suggest that they are. I'd be happy with incomplete manpage coverage, but presenting the wrong manpage is IMO unacceptable. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GNOME Do" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gnome-do?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
