While not adding a terminal to Do, what about having the ability to capture
the output from a command in the Selected Text buffer in Do?

So I can run something like, oh, I dunno, `date`, and have the output
available to Google, or open a file, or tweet, or whatever else I can
possibly think to do with it in Do. One of the most powerful tools of UNIX
is the pipe, and Do has pipe-like capabilities too. Why not merge the two?

It could be a new action, like "Run Capturing Output" along side the default
Run action and the Run in Terminal action provided by the GNOME Terminal
plugin.

I myself would find this much more useful than having a terminal embedded
into Do itself.

Of course there's the problem that some commands may require user
interaction, or may flood Do with tons of useless output. Maybe if a program
tries to interact with the user Do can fork the command to a terminal (*i.e.
* fall back to Run in Terminal). Not sure how that would be accomplished,
but it sounds like a good idea to me. Also, for the problem of huge data
floods, have the option of dropping the data into a text editor.

What do you think?

-Josh

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:31 PM, David Siegel <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> So far, the use cases you mention are satisfied by the GNOMETerminal
> plugin.
>
> Do is meant to be the glue between activities on your computer, not a
> replacement for the activities themselves; we really do not want Do to
> become a monolithic app, I even argued against adding a calendar yo
> Docky! GNOME Terminal is its own application, with its own developers,
> bug tracker, documentation, etc. Asking our project  to duplicate all
> of that is too big a price to pay for such little gain.
>
> David
>
> Sent from my latest-and-greatest, proprietary, DRM-enabled, crypto-
> locked gadget.
>
> On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:59 AM, baldurpet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >> I don't understand how this would be any different than opening a
> >> Terminal
> >> window and minimizing it to Docky. Except for maybe a keyboard
> >> shortcut.
> >
> > Except when you stop using it it goes away and doesn't clutter your
> > screen, even though it keeps running. I could see how this would prove
> > useful when downloading a program; you'd just type "apt-get
> > install ...", "wget ..." or what ever and then start doing something
> > else. A shortcut might also be helpful like you said.
> >
> > If it would be anything like the AWN terminal it would also be very
> > quick to open because it never really closes
> > >
>
> >
>


-- 
Society loses the value of things which are uselessly destroyed.
--Frederick Bastiat

ICBM Address
Latitude:  41°27'33.20"N
Longitude: 112° 2'39.88"W
Don't Shoot!

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"GNOME Do" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gnome-do?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to