On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 13:04 +0000, Calum Benson wrote: > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:16 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: > > > > > > So, my suggestion: > > > > > > The application launcher "%s" has not been marked as trusted. If you do > > > not know this application launcher's source, launching it may be unsafe. > > > > This looks good to me, can i have another string freeze approval please? > > Hmm, guess I've come to this party too late, but I do have one slight > concern about the use of "Trusted". That term has a specific meaning on > at least one GNOME-based secure desktop I'm aware of (Trusted Solaris-- > which is the only one I've used, but I wouldn't be surprised if it > applied to others, too).
Hmm, what do you propose to use then? Using "Executable" in the UI sounds pretty lame, its an implementation detail after all. _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n