Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@...> writes: > .... > > The reaction (not overreaction) by "old-timers" is based on their experience > > with what works and what not, and with technical and non-technical user > > bases. > > Most of these birds are (and should be) concerned with ease-of-use and sane > > continuity of design of their daily tools. > > Bogus. Don't try the old-war-horse defense. I'm an old war horse. > Professional UNIX admin for >15 years, used LINUX since kernel 0.99a, > and paid subscriber back in the Ximian days. > > There are lots of things that are clunky in the 'legacy' 2.x GNOME, 3.0 > has some shiney-and-new wobbles, but the direction is well thought out. > Things change. Move on. > >
Adam, I am aware of what innovation is and *am for* moving to GNOME 3. You misrepresent my intentions. I am aginst a psedo-innovation like in case I described in my original post. It is limited to that aspect, for now. Get it. JB _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list