On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 10:56 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Paul Cutler > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd like to propose that we follow up on Vincent's comments and form a > > small team to investigate if any other solutions might be a better > > fit. It's possible in the last 2 1/2 years the technology and the > > members in the community might have changed enough that we might want > > to think about choosing a new CMS, based on the original requirements > > at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/CmsRequirements. My first instinct > > would be to evaluate Plone, Midgard (as it came in #2 last time ) and > > Drupal (as it seems to have grown greatly in its use over the last > > couple of years, and the major reason it wasn't chosen was i18n which > > may have changed in this time). > > This may qualify as bikeshedding but I'd also suggest looking at > elgg.org (a GPL-licensed social networking platform). It isn't a > traditional CMS by any stretch, so might be quickly dismissable as not > meeting most of the requirements, but it might be worth rethinking > what gnome.org would look like if it were primarily a tool for a gnome > *community*.
I think it's clear that feature creep won't help get this (should be) simple job done. -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
