Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>> I found that to be a strange response to me saying (in that same email)
>> that we should not block on choosing _any_ CMS. We don't need a CMS to
>> get the new structure and content online. A suitable CMS would be
>> _nice_, but it's not a blocker. Lack of committed web people is the
>> blocker.
>
> Any reason not simply go with MediaWiki? We already know that the wiki
> is where everything happens. Why not use it for everything?
>From my point of view I18n was deemed important (and a big gain
over the current scheme, and I agree wholeheartedly with that)
and the i18n story of wiki sites is usually quite poor.
But then I don't care much about chosen technology, and I agree with
Murray, the problem is lack of web people (or lack of familiarity with
web technologies by current GNOME hackers[1]). Whatever the technology
is, we first need people commited to achieve something.
Cheers,
Frederic
[1] but this is, slowly, changing.
_______________________________________________
gnome-web-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
