OK, my apologies for bringing it up.When there are good instructions on how to setup a good test environment I'll be interested in trying to help a bit.
Jaap On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 16:42, Lefty (石鏡 ) <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/8/09 2:44 AM, "Andreas Nilsson" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Talking CMS choices are one of those things that are just going to end >> up in a really long and boring thread without any real consensus. What I >> would like for us to focus on first is to get all the organization, >> content and design together and get it really, really good. Then we can >> implement that in whatever thing suits best. > > I'd have to agree with Andreas that this is an unprofitable way to approach > the discussion. There are better and worse kinds of hammers, but they can > all pretty much be used to drive nails, and talking about the relative > merits of the various hammers won't get any nails driven. > > Changing tools will not cause work which hasn't gotten done so far to > magically become accomplished independently of someone's sitting down and > doing it. My favorite flute instruction book has this advice on the first > page, in large letters: "MERE POSSESSION OF THIS BOOK IS _NOT_ SUFFICIENT." > > > > _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
