2009/5/8 Sébastien Nicouleaud <[email protected]>: > The python-imaging contains no python2.4 modules (2.5/2.6 only): > > $ dpkg -L python-imaging | grep python2.4 | wc -l > 0 > $ dpkg -L python-imaging | grep -E 'python2.5|python2.6' | wc -l > 178 > $ >
I've got all necessary packages installed and just did an "svn up" I think I run into the issue that python-imaging does not have 2.4 modules Any ideas Jaap > > > 2009/5/8 Sébastien Nicouleaud <[email protected]> >> >> I ran into the same issue. >> >> I added a PIL dependency in buildout.cfg: >> http://dev.plone.org/collective/changeset/85732 >> >> You just need to "svn up". >> >> Seb >> >> >> 2009/5/8 Jaap A. Haitsma <[email protected]> >>> >>> I'm trying this on Ubuntu Jaunty but >>> >>> ./bin/instance run src/wgo.installsite/wgo/installsite/installsite.py >>> >>> returns an error that I have: "No module named PIL" >>> >>> I've installed python-imaging and python2.4 but Jaunty by default uses >>> python2.6 >>> >>> Any ideas on how to solve this >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jaap >>> >>> 2009/5/8 Davi Lima <[email protected]>: >>> > I followed this link directions and it was fine: >>> > >>> > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/CmsSetup#head-eaedb971ca574848ff39be8f3fc10d22c3c535d5 >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Davi Lima >>> > >>> > 2009/5/8 Jaap A. Haitsma <[email protected]> >>> >> >>> >> OK, my apologies for bringing it up.When there are good instructions >>> >> on how to setup a good test environment I'll be interested in trying >>> >> to help a bit. >>> >> >>> >> Jaap >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 16:42, Lefty (石�R ) <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > On 5/8/09 2:44 AM, "Andreas Nilsson" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Talking CMS choices are one of those things that are just going to >>> >> >> end >>> >> >> up in a really long and boring thread without any real consensus. >>> >> >> What >>> >> >> I >>> >> >> would like for us to focus on first is to get all the organization, >>> >> >> content and design together and get it really, really good. Then we >>> >> >> can >>> >> >> implement that in whatever thing suits best. >>> >> > >>> >> > I'd have to agree with Andreas that this is an unprofitable way to >>> >> > approach >>> >> > the discussion. There are better and worse kinds of hammers, but >>> >> > they >>> >> > can >>> >> > all pretty much be used to drive nails, and talking about the >>> >> > relative >>> >> > merits of the various hammers won't get any nails driven. >>> >> > >>> >> > Changing tools will not cause work which hasn't gotten done so far >>> >> > to >>> >> > magically become accomplished independently of someone's sitting >>> >> > down >>> >> > and >>> >> > doing it. My favorite flute instruction book has this advice on the >>> >> > first >>> >> > page, in large letters: "MERE POSSESSION OF THIS BOOK IS _NOT_ >>> >> > SUFFICIENT." >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> gnome-web-list mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > gnome-web-list mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gnome-web-list mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list >> > >
_______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
