On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:58:02 -0500, Aaron Bentley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Anderson wrote: > > > Tom, can you comment on this? This seems like a pretty fundamental > > design point. > > We discussed this recently in g-a-d, and Tom said: > > The code *was* meant to do that. You are thinking about a bug.
Sorry, the gnu-arch-dev search function appears broken (it says it gets matches but doesn't list any.) This quip is entirely unclear without context. The code was meant to do what? (Is "that" what it does now or what we are saying it looks like it should do?) "You are thinking about a bug" is just as ambiguous. Bob _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
