On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:31:13PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >* Magnus Therning: > >> Of course Arch doesn't suffer from the shortcoming, and it passes the >> "litmus test" with flying colours. > >Really? Does it correctly handle newly added files in renamed >directories?
Well, following the thread it seems you've pointed out a good test to add to the regression tests :-) I also have to admit that it took some testing to understand exactly what you meant. The failure comes when trying to merge from a branch where a file has been added in a directory that has been renamed in the trunk. All other scenarios I could come up with works as I would expect. When this little omission is fixed I'll be even more sure that using Arch is the right thing to do :-) (As I read the blog entry, the "litmus test" related to files only, and that is something that Arch handles just fine.) /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://magnus.therning.org/ Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish. Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship by patent law on written works. The number of the beast - vi vi vi -- Delexa Jones
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
