On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 18:07 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Strange. Are you unhappy with the "new generation" SCMs that came > forward in the time around the bitkeeper fiasco or soon after? Why? > I'm personally really impressed with git/cogito and mercurial. Darcs > and BazaarNG are also interesting, but as I've been burned with > patch-tracking SCMs...
There seems to be a misconception here.
BazaarNG is much closer to Mercurial than to Darcs. Actually,
model-wise, BazaarNG and Mercurial are pretty much exchangeable. I
suspect the (publicly conducted) BazaarNG design phase was quite
influential to Mercurial.
--
-- ddaa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
