On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:19:10 -0800 Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's your call, Andy, but if you're soliciting opinions: I think that's > a dumb idea. > > One should always be extremely paranoid when injecting a call to > `rmrf_file' into Arch. It's just about the most dangerous function > in the whole thing (and, indeed, is pretty darn dangerous). At risk of setting a precedent here, I'd have to agree with Tom on this one. Corrupted revlib entries SHOULD NOT happen in normal operation, and just brushing it under the carpet like it didn't happen is highly dangerous. At the very least it should be rename()d out of the way, so that future code can at least proceed and recreate it to work with. But I think it would be highly wrong to just plain delete it. -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
