> That's a big assumption, isn't it? Specifically, is "a strong hash of
> the whole revision" significantly easier to compute reliably than a
> Git tree object?
What's so hard about computing a hash of a whole revision? especially
knowing this is a revision in a revlib, i.e. there should be no extra
spurious file, except for the ones tla puts there.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/