Stefan> But IIUC rather than removing the revlib, it would be
Stefan> better to re-snap the inodes because the revlib hasn't
Stefan> actually been corrupted. Right?
> It seems to me you'd have to be pretty tricky to save much over
> rebuilding the revlib, at least if you wanted to be sure.
Assuming you have a strong hash of the whole revision, re-snapping can be
done without accessing the archive, whereas rebuilding the revision would
require accessing the archive. When the archive is remote, the difference
is enormous.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
