> Now only login users can edit pages, to avoid spam. Do you have some stats about the kind of contributions we get on the wiki (authenticated, not-authenticated)?
If non-authenticated changes represent a decent part of the contributions, then we should consider accepting anonymous changes again and remove spam after the fact. I would rather get spam and more contributions instead of neither of them. If however anonymous contributions represent a negligeable part of the changes, there's no problem in requiring authentication. As far as I'm concerned, I remember not contributing to wikis when a 15s change became 5 tedious minutes to create the account and store the credentials somewhere :/ -- Sylvain _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
