Andy
On 6/15/06, Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now only login users can edit pages, to avoid spam.
Do you have some stats about the kind of contributions we get on the
wiki (authenticated, not-authenticated)?
If non-authenticated changes represent a decent part of the
contributions, then we should consider accepting anonymous changes
again and remove spam after the fact.
I would rather get spam and more contributions instead of neither of
them.
If however anonymous contributions represent a negligeable part of the
changes, there's no problem in requiring authentication.
As far as I'm concerned, I remember not contributing to wikis when a
15s change became 5 tedious minutes to create the account and store
the credentials somewhere :/
Sylvain
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
