On 17 Jun 2006 16:19:30 -0700, Andy Tai wrote: > > On 6/17/06, Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > > >OK, although I didn't speak about pages, but about implicit license of > >new contributions (to either old or new pages). > > Due to "copyleft", licensing conditions of new contributions to old > pages must be the same.
This is not very correct. The new contributions may be under GPL v2+, that is certainly compatible with the old license. > So we cannot extend the use of GPL v3 or later onto these pages. And noone suggested this. However if the page changes list 2 contributors and they both want to relicense, then this would be possible. By placing new changes under GPL v2+, any possible relicensing is easier, if needed. Regards, Mikhael. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
