OK, the Arch wiki is the existing (actually very valuable, and the most detailed) documents on Arch that are already GPL v2 licensed for a long time. So this is what we have to work with.
Sure. But that wasn't was I was answering about, it was the claim that GPLv3draft is somehow supposed to be suitable for Wiki content. Which is what Stephen was refering to. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
