On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:03:48 +0000 Ineiev <ine...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Anyway, I think this discussion is a little off-topic on this list. > > It is being discussed whether a free distribution may want to represent itself > as Open Source.
I think there is a misunderstanding. ConnochaetOS, as far as I as the maintainer can stand for it, represents itself explicitly as Free Software. However, I am not alone and there are people who help the project, especially in the forum by answering questions from users and doing some documentation in the wiki. They feel obligated to free software. But they may use sometimes wordings that may look unfortunate by some other people in the Free Software Community. This is how we came here. Now, there are some points that should be clarified: 1. The Free System Distribution Guidelines doesn't require to use or to avoid explicit wordings. It requires that a free distro "must take care not to recommend nonfree software." The FSDG covers content of a free distros documentation, but there is no prescribed terminology. If I am mistaken, please correct me. 2. In the explicit case it is discussed if it is okay, if some members of a free distro use the term "open source" in its documentation. I had a discussion with a representative of the FSFE about this matter, and the FSFEs summarized point of view is "We prefer the term "free software", but if you say "open source" it is fine with us, because it is the same thing". So, from the FSFEs point of view there should be no problem. I myself see this matter a little more severe. I think the term "free software" should be used, and I correct wordings occasionally. But since many new users are involved and the community is growing I can't control every sentence they write. What's more: In a hypothetical discussion in our community about this issue, a member who uses the term "open source" can always refer to the FSFE and say "Hey, the FSFE said, it is okay when I say "open source"". Since 90 percent of our community is living in Europe that would be a reasonable point and one could hardly argue against that. Regards, Henry
