[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> agreed - but there are good reasons to prefer the logical approach I disagree in a general way with this approach. It consists of rigidity for the sake of rigidity. This is an issue where we are dealing with various other people and hoping they will follow our decisions. That means we must make judgments based on the situation, NOT just on a rigid rule. > for one, decisions based on logic are objectively verifiable, and they can be > decided in a finite amount of time - decisions relying on judgments are > subjective, and can drag on indefinitely That is not important in these cases. If we don't come to a clear conclusion about a program like ScummVM, we simply do nothjing. > for every similar instance, it becomes a sisyphusian task There will not be so many -- we will only bother with the programs that people bring to our attention. And we don't need to re-evaluate them unless there are is a pressing case to do so. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)