On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:50:13 +0100
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The point isn't about caring or not caring, many people license things
> under the GPL and don't care if the work is used in non-free programs.
> It is still a license violation; only that nobody knows about it or
> can prove that it happend.

In which case the law doesn't consider itself competent to intervene.
Absence of proof means innocence. What you are talking about is
morality, not legality.

Take care,

-- 
Stefaan
-- 
As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning,
and meaningful statements lose precision. -- Lotfi Zadeh 
_______________________________________________
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to