Merijn de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2006-05-16, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Merijn de Weerd wrote: >>> Suppose you add a lot of code to implement a really robust and >>> unique embedded software stack that makes a great product. You'd >>> want to keep that proprietary to prevent your competition from >>> gaining the same advantage that you just worked months or years to >>> create. Yet, you have to share if you build upon GPL software. >>> The same should apply to the in-house environment you describe. >>> >> so its basically "if i modify any gpl'd code I must give away my changes >> whether or not i keep it 'in-house' "? > > Right now the GPL makes a distinction for in-house code. Only > if you distribute binaries do you have to share the source. I > was just saying that that should change: also in-house code > should be shared, once it's out of testing.
Why should that change? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
