> I have a proprietary sdk that is being distributed. As part of > this sdk, I have an /examples/ folder where I include source code > showing how to use various elements of the sdk in various display > enviornments. We have on example based on X11, another for > OpenGL. I want to include a Qt example with my code, as well, > since there has been some interest in it. The actual sdk being > released contains no GPL components, and this would merely be an > example of how to use the SDK and Qt. This example program would > dynamically link to both Qt and my sdk's library. Does including > this example source code in my distrubuted tarball put the entire > thing, including the sdk, under the GPL?
Of course not - you're not including Qt, are you? If it's source code you wrote yourself, that happens to call Qt routines, then it is not subject to the Qt license. By linking to a GPLed library, which Qt is, you must abide by that license. Also, the OP is _including_ GPLed source code into his library, not just linking it. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
