"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > > Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Linking == modification. > > These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If > identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Linking == deriviate work.
Your GPL-FAQing GNUish crackpot "deriviate" theory is just an evidence that can be really helpful in the context of insanity defense for GNUtians outside the GNU Republic. > > Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Linking == depends on another work to function. It's interoperability (what GNU Reichsminister für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda calls "interpenetration"), retard. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
