David Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:08:47 +0200 (CEST) Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > >> It should be noted to all that Davids opinion is exactly that, his >> own; it is also a complete misrepresentation of the opinion of the >> FSF. The FSF has been clear on this point, in that a GPL-incompatible >> work that links to a GPL work is illegal. This is both answered in >> the FAQ, and in other spots on www.gnu.org. > > What about all the java software published under the GPL that > only runs on the Sun VM with the Sun classpath libraries? Or > if i link a GPL program against a non free libc? Where is the > difference to the example program that links against a free > and a non free library? I would have thought that it's > sufficient to publish *only* the example program under the > GPL.
<URL:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL> <URL:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLIncompatibleLibs> > To the OP: not sure how expensive it is but Trolltech offers > other licenses. But he won't need a license if he does not include Qt. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
