"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: [...] > The SFLC would actually be a even more profitable business if the GPL > was unenforacble, they would sue anyone who distributes GPL software, > since if the license is indeed invalid, you fall back on default > copyright law, which is very restrictive.
You misread "invalid" to your advantage. Think about it for a minute, ueber GNUtian ams. Ready now? Here's breaking news: "invalid" means that your invalid *demands* (not permissions) are void, and the rest is just fine. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
