David Kastrup wrote: [...] > I mean, while we are in the "who can come up with the silliest > irrelevant hypothetical" contest, this entry seems as good as any.
No. We are in "enforcing invalid license contracts" episode. You seem to suggest that it would require "a three-headed fire-breathing dragon". That doesn't sound good or assuring for the GPL, GNUtian dak. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
