Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
The SFLC will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER allow a district court to review
the terms of their preempted, unenforceable GPL license on the
merits. The fat revenue stream from charitable funds flowing into
SFLC's attorneys' pockets would suddenly cease if their one of
their crackpot complaints was ever reviewed by the court.
The SFLC would actually be a even more profitable business if the GPL
was unenforacble, they would sue anyone who distributes GPL software,
since if the license is indeed invalid, you fall back on default
copyright law, which is very restrictive.
Dear Alfred,
May I suggest that you google [ "promissory estoppel" "detrimental reliance" ]?
Sincerely,
Rjack
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss