In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hyman Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Barry Margolin wrote: > > A new version of Linux with a different scheduler serves the same > > purpose: they're both operating system kernels. > > But the new scheduler is not a transformed version of any other code. > Both are required for a work to be derivative. It's not the scheduler that's a derivative, it's the new Linux kernel that results from replacing the scheduler in the old kernel. I.e. Linux - schedulerA + schedulerB => derivative of Linux. -- Barry Margolin, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss