Ben Pfaff wrote: [...] > Linux is not designed to support pluggable schedulers, and in > fact Linus has expressly said that he does not want Linux to > easily support dropping in alternate schedulers. Thus, > implementing a new scheduler in Linux is fairly likely to require > significant modifications to Linux outside the new scheduler > itself.
"Significant modifications to Linux outside the new scheduler itself" may well constitute a derivative work. But that don't change the status of the new scheduler itself being entirely original and not a derivative work. Grok it now? regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
