"amicus_curious" <[email protected]> writes: > "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > >> >> The recipient of GPLed software is free to declare the GPL void and >> revert to default copyright rules. >> > What is at issue today, though, is the nature of such "default > copyright rules". If there is no fee charged to use the work or to > redistribute the work, the copyright can be ignored unless the author > can show some degree of harm to himself.
Since when? If I send a personal letter to someone, I don't charge a fee for it. He still is not authorized for redistributing my letter or using its content in publications of his. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
