"Hyman Rosen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
amicus_curious wrote:
Well you doubless lack the legal education of the district court judge so
the conventional wisdom is that he is more likely to be correct than you.
But he was already found wrong once by the appeals court,
so he could be wrong again.
Even so, how do you think that Jacobsen can manage to show "irreparable
harm" in regard to Katzer's use of the code?
By showing that Katzer did not honor the terms of the license.
That doesn't seem to be sufficient anymore. That is the whole issue here.
It once was a slam dunk and now it may be necessary to actually show how one
is harmed. That is where the GPL is weakest and the Artistic license, too.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
