Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 2/4/2010 2:09 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > Hyman Rosen wrote: > > [...] > >> If you are choosing to copy and distribute GPLed > >> work unmodified, other sections of the various versions of > >> the GPL tell you what to do. > > > > Yes Hyman, copying unmodified such as copying for compilations > > (collective works) have nothing to do with > > > > "These requirements apply to the modified work" > > > > part of the GPL. So why did you quote the passage above you idiot? > > Aren't you talking about statically linked programs?
I'm talking about "copy and distribute" of compilations (collective works) as a whole, including components, which means unmodified copying of the components you retard. A "statically linked" aggregate is a compilation (collective work) or uncopyrightable aggregation, depending on the level of creativity involved in selection of components. Got it now Hyman? regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
