On 3/16/2010 1:00 PM, RJack wrote:
Even the "distribution" of derivative works? Really? Hop on over to your copy of the Copyright Act and show us. Who am I supposed to believe? You or my lyin' eyes?
17 USC 106, of course. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/usc_sec_17_00000106----000-.html> (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; Copyright in a derivative work is held by both the original author and by the author of the derivative work, and therefore distribution of a derivative work is the exclusive right of both of the authors of the work. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
