Hyman Rosen wrote: >On 4/8/2010 3:18 PM, RJack wrote: >> Post a verifiable settlement agreement or >> admit the SFLC cut and ran. > >It is not necessary to "post a verifiable settlement agreement" >and it is probably impossible to do so, since settlements are >often kept private. It is only necessary to see that the SFLC >demands compliance with the GPL, and that such compliance exists >once the suit ends. That will be true of Comtrend once they get >their broken links fixed, just as it has been true with every >other defendant with whom the SFLC has settled.
Odd. I tried the top one myself, yesterday, and it worked fine. Today, it's not. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
