chrisv wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/8/2010 3:18 PM, RJack wrote:
Post a verifiable settlement agreement or admit the SFLC cut and
ran.
It is not necessary to "post a verifiable settlement agreement" and
it is probably impossible to do so, since settlements are often
kept private. It is only necessary to see that the SFLC demands
compliance with the GPL, and that such compliance exists once the
suit ends. That will be true of Comtrend once they get their broken
links fixed, just as it has been true with every other defendant
with whom the SFLC has settled.
Odd. I tried the top one myself, yesterday, and it worked fine.
Today, it's not.
I tried that link yesterday and it pointed to a tarball of a recent
(2008 I think) version of BusyBox. That's why in my prior post I asked
why the link didn't point to "BusyBox, v.0.60.3" as claimed in their
frivolous infringement lawsuit.
Sincerely,
RJack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
