On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:14:11 -0400, RJack wrote: > The SFLC is eager to cite Second Circuit authority when it suits its > purposes: > <SNIP DATA> > > But when it doesn't suit it purpose the SFLC chooses to utterly ignore > Second Circuit precedent such as: > <SNIP DATA>> > > The games have begun! > > Sincerely, > RJack :)
That is exactly what a lawyer is supposed to do. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
