On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:14:11 -0400, RJack wrote:

> The SFLC is eager to cite Second Circuit authority when it suits its
> purposes:
> 
<SNIP DATA>
> 
> But when it doesn't suit it purpose the SFLC chooses to utterly ignore
> Second Circuit precedent such as:
> 
<SNIP DATA>>
> 
> The games have begun!
> 
> Sincerely,
> RJack :)

That is exactly what a lawyer is supposed to do.

_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to