RJack wrote:
> 
> On 6/17/2011 8:55 AM, Hyman Rosen wrote:
> > On 6/17/2011 8:47 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> >> The contradiction would be if the court would order not to pay
> >> attorney's fees.
> >
> > Do you believe that at the conclusion of a case, one party pays the
> > attorney fees of another unless a court instructs them not to do so?
> > How odd.
> 
> How else do you believe a badly losing plaintiff gets a winning
> defendant to agree to a stipulated Rule 41 voluntary dismissal "WITH
> PREDJUDICE"?

David Leichtman 

"Defendant  
Best Buy Co., Inc.  represented by David Leichtman 
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP (NYC) 
601 Lexington Avenue, Suite 3400 
New York, NY 10022 
(212) 980-7400 
Fax: (212) 980-7499 
Email: dleicht...@rkmc.com 
LEAD ATTORNEY 
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED"

(TERMINATED: 06/14/2011)

strikes again... 

The PACER reports:

"06/30/2011 207  NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Leichtman on behalf of
ZYXEL Communications Inc. (Leichtman, David) (Entered: 06/30/2011)"

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to