On 7/13/13 9:04 PM, in article [email protected], "Red Blade" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 20:40:06 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> >> >>> (Again note I made a mistake, "they told me "Living Standard" was a >>> MAFIAA coup waiting to happen." should instead be "I told them...") >> >> I figured that was what you meant. No harm. > > And what's worse, *knowing* that everyone *still* religiously defends the > Hollywood Mafia hard-coded into all HTML5 pages, because it will enable > moving away from proprietary Flash/Silverlight to DRM-free open > standards. Proprietary DRM you now UNCONDITIONALLY SUPPORT because the > W3C does the EXACT SAME THING WHY YOU OPPOSED FLASH/SILVERLIGHT IN THE > FIRST PLACE? Doing the exact same thing twice and expecting different > results - IT MAKES NO SENSE!!!!!! What method would you suggest for companies and individuals to protect their property? For example, I produce video series I sell. How should I protect them in your view? -- "Maybe there is someone who considers it disgusting for a parrot to have sex with a human. Or for a dolphin or tiger to have sex with a human. So what? Others feel that all sex is disgusting." -- Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
