On 7/14/13 5:49 PM, in article [email protected], "Red Blade" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 16:51:25 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>> >> The question is about how I should protect my property... and you (in my >> mind correctly) acknowledged it should be my choice. And those choices >> include many DRM methods which are available to me. My choice. >> >> Choice is good. > > No, because the law forces us to accept your "choice" or become felons > and serve heavy fines and jailtime (WIPO treaty/DMCA, etc). Of course you do not get to use *my* property as *you* wish... you get to use my property as *I* wish (or as I license you to use it, really). > Otherwise, your malicious attempts to control your customers' private lives > and use of private property in their private homes, you would be playing > catch-up with your malicious products like you should. How is it malicious to want to control my own property? I do not follow. > Or maybe we'd have a *REAL* choice - the choice to buy something from someone > who sells your videos with your privacy-intrusive and property- destroying > copy controls, subjecting you to the laws of a just and true free market where > your video business will be forced to be non- destructive and non-intrusive in > order to survive. Who said I would do anything destructive or intrusive? I was talking about protecting my property. You changed the topic completely! -- "But you used an untraceable "burner phone" which I could not call back to." -- Mark Bilk, showing he thinks people cannot call "burner phones" even if you have their number from Caller ID. Huh? How is that again, Bilk? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
