On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:49:10 +0000, Red Blade wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 16:51:25 -0700, Snit wrote: > > >> The question is about how I should protect my property... and you (in >> my mind correctly) acknowledged it should be my choice. And those >> choices include many DRM methods which are available to me. My choice. >> >> Choice is good. > > No, because the law forces us to accept your "choice" or become felons > and serve heavy fines and jailtime (WIPO treaty/DMCA, etc). Otherwise, > your malicious attempts to control your customers' private lives and use > of private property in their private homes, you would be playing > catch-up with your malicious products like you should. > > Or maybe we'd have a *REAL* choice - the choice to buy something from > someone who sells your videos with your privacy-intrusive and property- > destroying copy controls, subjecting you to the laws of a just and true > free market where your video business will be forced to be non- > destructive and non-intrusive in order to survive.
typo: "videos with your privacy-intrusive..." should be "videos without your privacy-intrusive..." -- Red Blade http://www.libertycolumns.com/ http://www.danq.co/ http://www.twitter.co/danqco/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
