On Thursday, 23 April 1998, Jan Arne Fagertun writes:
> The problem occurs because lilypond (or you) use bold (line 105 in
> los-toros-oboe.ly : '\textstyle "bold";', and several other places.)
>
> It will probably be OK if you remove this - at least it is OK when I
> change line 10761 in los-toros-oboe.tex from
>
> {\centeralign{\setbold{Un peu plus lent et \'el\'egant}%
>
> to
>
> {\centeralign{Un peu plus lent et \'el\'egant%
>
> So - the font is probably the problem.
No, i want it in bold.
I found that if i comment-out the line
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
in los-toros-oboe.<pid>.tex, its all fine.
What's this fontenc package supposed to do, can we junk it?
> Why does los-toros-oboe-16.tex give the desired result, then?
>
> Because you use another font, I guess - by including
> \usepackage{fancyheadings}, \pagestyle{fancy}, and/or
> \thispagestyle{fancy}.
No, this is just for handy headers and footers, there is either
a bug in the standard 'headings' (package), or its correct use is
lame and obscure.
> BTW - could you repeat which of the mailing lists we are allowed to
> mail to, and - if we aren't allowed to use "help" and "discuss"
> - explain why you use it?
For any useful discussion on music issues or Lily, everyone is free
to use gnu-music-discuss. Bugs may be sent to this list too, esp.
if you think its something that has not a single obvious solution.
At this time, having help-gnu-music and bug-gnu-music too is a bit
overdone, it may proof useful once we have a user-base > 1000, in a
few months after the 0.2 release.
Only info-gnu-music is moderated, you cannot post directly to that
list. We only announce LilyPond releases there.
(We'll add a comment to Documentation/lilypond)
Jan.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LilyPond - The GNU music typesetter
http://www.digicash.com/~jan | http://www.cs.ruu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond