> . saying
   > 
   >     lilypond -o foo.tex foo.ly
   > 
   >   creates a file called `foo.tex.tex' -- is this really
   >   intentional?

   What Han-Wen meant in his answer is that typically, lilypond will
   output two files, one .tex file and one .midi file, you could also
   get for example a .ps file.  For this reason, the -o option does
   only set the base name of the file.

Hmm, I think it would be easy to check whether the file name has
`.tex' as a suffix.  If yes, it should be removed.  And if someone
really wants `foo.tex.tex', he must enter `-o foo.tex.' -- I think
this is the default behaviour of many other programs.


    Werner

Reply via email to