>>>>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2000 19:07:56 -0600, Bryan Larsen >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Bryan> On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rob Walker wrote: >> >>>>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2000 18:15:00 -0600, Bryan Larsen >> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Bryan> 1. better investment reports. This requires a strategy to Bryan> deal with things like commissions and dividends. My opinion is Bryan> that this should be dealt with via meta-information. We Bryan> shouldn't be setting account policy. >> Bryan> 2. better entry of investments. I'm not asking for a wizard, Bryan> but it's a pain in the butt to have to switch account windows Bryan> to enter commissions, etc. >> Bryan> 3. better entry of budgets. You may have noticed that I've Bryan> spent more time on the budget output than on the input. :) >> Bryan> 4. graphing infrastructure, using a similar strategy to my new Bryan> report infrastructure. The goal is to make it easier to switch Bryan> away from gnuplot if so desired, as well as make it easier to Bryan> add new graphs. >> Bryan> Except for #2, I think I would be a good person to handle these Bryan> jobs. Unfortunately, my day job and my social life and my Bryan> sleep consume virtually all of my time. It'd probably take me Bryan> a month to do any one of the three. Any opinions on what I Bryan> should work on? >> >> 3, 2, 4, 1. Bryan> That's why I asked. This is almost the reverse order of my Bryan> priority. Did you put #1 last because somebody is working on Bryan> it? Did you put #3 first because you'll use the budget if I Bryan> add it? I put 3 first because I am having a bear of a time figuring out how to put our budgets into gnucash. Yes, I will use it if you build it. I will also try to help debug it and ask lots of questions while you build it. I put 1 last because I thought it was more like 4, and if you do 4, 1 will go away. rob -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
